Unique Services
EOR, IOR & WAG technologies implementation
         

       Increase Production Potential

       Barrel Chasing

       Sweat the Asset

       Production System Optimisation

       Operating the Limit

       Producing the Limit

       Must Win Battle

       Critical Issues

Reservoir, drilling, inflow performance, completion design, petroleum engineering, production technology, facilities design, maintenance, artificial lift, EOR. IOR, WAG, beanups, gas lift, water flooding, flowlines, manifolds, well testing, workovers, production facilities, export, refining, lifting, business intelligence, commercial acumen, entrepreneurship

Tune total production systems to maximise sustainable production & minimise Operating cost

Define and deliver capital projects to maximise value from EP opportunities

Deliver wells which realise maximum value from reserves

Business Intelligence for better business decisions

Services

Acquisition, Processing & Interpretation of 2D & 3D Seismic data, Drilling Rigs capable of 3000m well depths, Drill Fluid, Cementing, Directional Drilling with MWD/LWD, Wire line Logging & Perforation, DST both Open hole & Cased hole, Mud Logging, Casing & Tubing running, Fishing, Well control, Drilling equipment rental, Production Testing, Civil Engineering & Drill site preparation, Coring, Well stimulation services, Well construction, etc.

Materials/Supplies:

Drilling Bits, Tubular Casing, Tubing & Line pipes, Completion Tools, Well Head & X-Mas Trees, Cement & Cementing down-hole accessories-equipment. Packer, Bridge Plug, etc.

Other Services:

Customs Clearance, Freight & Forwarding, Trucking, Vehicle Hiring services, Drilling Manpower sourcing, Security Guard services, etc.

       Reservoir Potential Evaluation

      The volume of oil the reservoir can continuously sustain under optimum conditions, i.e. no limitations wrt number of drainage points -  no reservoir, facilities , or operational constraints

       Inflow potential estimation

      the reservoir potential adjusted for reservoir constraints , pressure decline, water/gas production, inflow performance (impairment or sand exclusion) . May be constrained by a further 3 factors

       the lifting % of the conduit i.e. vertical lift performance, conduit size, conduit deposits (wax, scale)

       downstream facility constraints I.e. process limitations, export system constraints

       combination of both above e.g. system backpressure created by process affecting conduit flow performance

       Conduit Potential estimation

      each of the wells in the integrated production system has a finite maximum throughput, (conduit potential) hence the max production rate from the reservoir within the field is the sum of the individual conduit potentials

       Production Planning

      is the max production rate under ‘normal’ operating conditions which could be produced if all wells and facilities were fully operational.  The difference between the sum of the unrestricted conduit potentials and the actual production determines the ‘mismatch’

       Maximum Production Target

      Although the production is a theoretically achievable target there are a number of factors which must be included to safeguard integrity - Maintenance activities determining the the max production target

       Production Availability

      Operating at max production target further limited by scheduled and unscheduled deferments due to operations, maintenance and engineering modification processes which will determine the production availability

       Production Target

      Will be determined by customer demands and own use (and losses), the injection target will be determined by reservoir management i.e. voidage control.  The production target is in itself vulnerable.  In the event of unplanned offtake restrictions related to downstream activities (tanker delays) offtake levels may not reach target levels, a deferment which should be taken into account and recorded for future references

       Drilling           Recompletions  Stimulations      Additional perforations   Re-perforations         Sand exclusion           Zone Changes

       Bean ups                               Artifical lift optimisation               Removal of conduit restrictions Zone changes    Commingling/de-commingling Debottleknecking i.e.known &   scheduled surface constraints Sub-optimal well performance

       Engineering modifications             Safeguarding - routines          Scheduled & unscheduled maintenance Unscheduled facility shutdowns    Unscheduled downstream constraints e.g. tanker loading, community disturbances

Deferrment of production due to Maintenance -

       represents around 30% of total EP OPEX 

       on Group basis hydrocarbon deferment due to Maintenance activities represents 50% + of the difference between conduit potential and actual production every day

       Maintenance activities secure by their application continued technical integrity of aging assets            

       Maximise revenue by;

       High levels of routine maintenance compliance

       Apply analytical techniques to optimise maintenance

       Increase non intrusive maintenance and inspection

       Create incentive structures for maintainers

       ensure high availability which should attract Low OPEX

 

 

Statement on Auditing Standards No. 70: Service Organizations (SAS 70)
The Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 70, Service Organizations, is an internationally recognized auditing standard developed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. SAS 70, as amended by the AICPA on 1 May 2004, addresses the effect that a service organization may have on its client's financial reporting objectives. CICA 5970 is the Canadian version of SAS 70. SAS No. 70 is generally applicable when an auditor is auditing the financial statements of a user organization that obtains services from another organization, or service provider. These service providers could be application service providers, bank trust departments, claims processing centres, Internet data centres, or other data processing service bureaus.
readmore

Our Customers

"Certainly made a positive impact on the success of the company - Nigel Fisher from Multinational Oil & Gas Co"   

 

 

They have been very consistent with their efforts. Rightly they should be rewarded.

 

regards,

Devarajan.N, East Asset Manager

 

First, allow me to congratulate you for an excellent job  

Well bore entry incurs the risk of losing a tool string in the well

"junk in the hole" and that can be a big problem as you point out.

I like the fact that you pointed out all of the hazards of well bore

intervantion, including hazard exposure and integrity problems.

A job well done. 

   

Jim Hall

Shell International Exploration & Production, B.V.

Artificial Lift Team

 

“ICT and Creativity— Today’s Essential Tools for Tomorrow’s Progress”

Level 4 Competition

your Entry has won the Third prize in the Level 4 competition, INFORAMA 2002

Dr Faqir Gul

Committee Chairman

Level -  4 Competition, INFORAMA 2002

ITB, Brunei University

 

Keep up the good work.

 

'theo, Shell   

 

Well done.

 

Jennifer Tulloch, Shell  

Contact Us | Terms of Use | Trademarks | Privacy Policy | HSE Policy - © 2008 ITL Calgary - An Eco-Friend Inc. Company